If you want to see some pictures of us having fun with our texas friends, click here.
It involves a LOT of popcorn.
Monday, August 4, 2008
Thursday, July 31, 2008
what's going on?
U.S. Blacks, if a Nation, Would Rank High on AIDS - NYTimes.com:
"If black America were a country, it would rank 16th in the world in the number of people living with the AIDS virus, the Black AIDS Institute, an advocacy group, reported Tuesday."
Given this report, I am certain that if we look at world statistics, HIV/AIDS sufferers would be disproportionally black. What does this mean?
"If black America were a country, it would rank 16th in the world in the number of people living with the AIDS virus, the Black AIDS Institute, an advocacy group, reported Tuesday."
Given this report, I am certain that if we look at world statistics, HIV/AIDS sufferers would be disproportionally black. What does this mean?
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
power and hope
After taking a long break from politics --- I’m back. I needed time to reassess my relationship to politics and the candidates, especially in light of my faith commitments. So, I stopped watching CNN (mostly), I stopped reading editorials and political commentaries, and I stopped giving money to Obama.
It’s been healthy. On my office wall hangs the quote by Dr. King, “"The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state. It must be the guide and the critic of the state, and never its tool. If the church does not recapture its prophetic zeal, it will become an irrelevant social club without moral or spiritual authority."
Over the last month, I have wrestled with what this quote means. My dad sends me weekly letters linking Obama with Hitler. While I was initially offended with this allusion, I understand what my dad is getting at. Charisma has power. And how will this power be used? Do I align myself with this power --- or is my relationship a bit more complex than this?
Several things in the last few weeks have reminded me why I support Obama (especially in comparison the alternatives). I don’t think Obama is a savior. However, I think he sees the world a bit more the way God sees it --- as a global, interconnected community. Critics are upset by what they see as a “transnational” president, and I don’t even want to know what the fundamentalists are saying. This plays perfectly into their fears of Obama is the anti-Christ. But if we choose to look through the lens of hope, instead of fear, I think that Obama’s perspective paints the possibility of a fundamentally different reality. I, for one, am tired of living under the tyranny of fear and terror, which has justified untold abuse and violence.
I can’t help but think we are so afraid of the unknown that we would rather cling to the logic of fear and it’s stepchildren of violence, abuse, terror, torture, and war. I’ll be honest. I’m afraid of the unknown too. At least with George Bush/John McCain we know what we will get – a world of black and white. A picture more comforting (at times) than a complex world of grays: shadows mingled with bursts of light.
Why is hope more frightening to us than fear itself? Perhaps because it forces us to walk in acknowledgment of our vulnerability and finitude realizing that we don’t have all the answers or the impenetrable ability to protect ourselves. Yet, despite all this, hope committees us to remain open to one another and to the world.
I don’t think it is my role as a follower of Christ is to unequivocally endorse Obama, but I will vote for him as I continue to listen to my own conscience. And I will continue to be challenged to shift my perspective from fear to hope --- hope not in the power of Obama, but in the power of God’s redemptive and reconciling work in the world. Seeing the people of the world as my neighbors is not a liberal position but rather the call of Christ. Therefore, how our nation treats our global neighbors is of paramount importance to me. What I see in Obama – in contrast to what I have seen for the last 8 years – excites me. It opens us new possibilities. But they are still unknown possibilities, possibilities so easily corrupted by power.
So in the words of Obama’s own prayer --- may we, as citizens of the world, be protected from pride and despair as we step forward in hope.
It’s been healthy. On my office wall hangs the quote by Dr. King, “"The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state. It must be the guide and the critic of the state, and never its tool. If the church does not recapture its prophetic zeal, it will become an irrelevant social club without moral or spiritual authority."
Over the last month, I have wrestled with what this quote means. My dad sends me weekly letters linking Obama with Hitler. While I was initially offended with this allusion, I understand what my dad is getting at. Charisma has power. And how will this power be used? Do I align myself with this power --- or is my relationship a bit more complex than this?
Several things in the last few weeks have reminded me why I support Obama (especially in comparison the alternatives). I don’t think Obama is a savior. However, I think he sees the world a bit more the way God sees it --- as a global, interconnected community. Critics are upset by what they see as a “transnational” president, and I don’t even want to know what the fundamentalists are saying. This plays perfectly into their fears of Obama is the anti-Christ. But if we choose to look through the lens of hope, instead of fear, I think that Obama’s perspective paints the possibility of a fundamentally different reality. I, for one, am tired of living under the tyranny of fear and terror, which has justified untold abuse and violence.
I can’t help but think we are so afraid of the unknown that we would rather cling to the logic of fear and it’s stepchildren of violence, abuse, terror, torture, and war. I’ll be honest. I’m afraid of the unknown too. At least with George Bush/John McCain we know what we will get – a world of black and white. A picture more comforting (at times) than a complex world of grays: shadows mingled with bursts of light.
Why is hope more frightening to us than fear itself? Perhaps because it forces us to walk in acknowledgment of our vulnerability and finitude realizing that we don’t have all the answers or the impenetrable ability to protect ourselves. Yet, despite all this, hope committees us to remain open to one another and to the world.
I don’t think it is my role as a follower of Christ is to unequivocally endorse Obama, but I will vote for him as I continue to listen to my own conscience. And I will continue to be challenged to shift my perspective from fear to hope --- hope not in the power of Obama, but in the power of God’s redemptive and reconciling work in the world. Seeing the people of the world as my neighbors is not a liberal position but rather the call of Christ. Therefore, how our nation treats our global neighbors is of paramount importance to me. What I see in Obama – in contrast to what I have seen for the last 8 years – excites me. It opens us new possibilities. But they are still unknown possibilities, possibilities so easily corrupted by power.
So in the words of Obama’s own prayer --- may we, as citizens of the world, be protected from pride and despair as we step forward in hope.
Monday, July 28, 2008
white privilege in america
I finally watched CNN’s Black in America. Though I was looking forward to the installments, on the night it premiered, I couldn’t bring myself to watch it. Like many, I feel conflicted about the series. I’m sensitive to the fact that it may reinforce stereotypes and representations, which is why I held off on watching it. I wish that there had been more time to unpack structural inequalities and the whole notion of white privilege. At the same time, there were a lot of realities portrayed in the documentaries that so much of white America is ignorant to.
I watched the segment on black men --- and honestly, I was left feeling depressed. Not so much with the circumstances people found themselves in, but rather, I was reminded of how pervasive privilege is. My husband and I can get in our car without worrying about being pulled over. We can drive into virtually any neighborhood without worrying that the cops will be called. I was shocked a few years ago when some of the students I worked with talked about being stopped by campus security (at their campus) and asked to show ID. No reason was given. I realize now that this is a pretty common scenario and replicated in various forms throughout society.
I worry that what white viewers will take from the film is pathology, instead of looking between the lines and acknowledging our relationship to and complicity in the conditions many African Americans and other minorities find themselves in. I applaud CNN in their ambitious attempts, but I can’t help but worry that for some, this will simply be a voyeuristic exercise that only confirms white prejudices and reifies our stereotypes.
I wish that there had been a whole segment on communities working together, creative solutions, and most of all, reconciliation. Also, maybe CNN should do a follow up documentary called “white privilege in America” where they track white people’s personal and communal stories of coming to terms with racism and privilege and their response to this realization – guilt, anger, denial, reconciliation, healing, etc. Now, that would truly be radical! Actually, come to think of it "white privilege in America" could just as well be the title of Black in America because it essentially is the wider narrative and framing backdrop at work in the documentary, even if not fully acknowledged.
Did you see Black in America? What did you think?
I watched the segment on black men --- and honestly, I was left feeling depressed. Not so much with the circumstances people found themselves in, but rather, I was reminded of how pervasive privilege is. My husband and I can get in our car without worrying about being pulled over. We can drive into virtually any neighborhood without worrying that the cops will be called. I was shocked a few years ago when some of the students I worked with talked about being stopped by campus security (at their campus) and asked to show ID. No reason was given. I realize now that this is a pretty common scenario and replicated in various forms throughout society.
I worry that what white viewers will take from the film is pathology, instead of looking between the lines and acknowledging our relationship to and complicity in the conditions many African Americans and other minorities find themselves in. I applaud CNN in their ambitious attempts, but I can’t help but worry that for some, this will simply be a voyeuristic exercise that only confirms white prejudices and reifies our stereotypes.
I wish that there had been a whole segment on communities working together, creative solutions, and most of all, reconciliation. Also, maybe CNN should do a follow up documentary called “white privilege in America” where they track white people’s personal and communal stories of coming to terms with racism and privilege and their response to this realization – guilt, anger, denial, reconciliation, healing, etc. Now, that would truly be radical! Actually, come to think of it "white privilege in America" could just as well be the title of Black in America because it essentially is the wider narrative and framing backdrop at work in the documentary, even if not fully acknowledged.
Did you see Black in America? What did you think?
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
growing

I am rereading Parker Palmer’s Let Your Life Speak. Right now, I feel a strong pull in me to pause and just let things ferment for a while. As much as my impulse is to try to figure everything out, to start lining up the ducks, to write feroicoulsy, read consistently, and list and relist, what I hear is “wait.” I know enough from my past experiences that I need to honor this, even if I don’t understand it.
This is the strangest process. I’m still learning how to honor my intuitions and pay attention to what brings me life and what drains life. The last few weeks have been an invitation to move deeper as I have confronted how much of my self is wrapped up in the projections and refractions of others. I have been trying so burdened by the need to get ahead and the need to acomplish a goal.
Palmer reminds me that “if the self seeks not pathology but wholeness […]then the willful pursuit of vocation is an act of violence towards ourselves – violence in the name of vision, that, however lofty, is forced on the self from without rather than grown from within .”
Growing anything takes time, patience, space. This is so counter to our society’s focus on setting goals, achieving them, and getting ahead. Our culture tells us that we cannot stop striving, working, planning. I don’t want to be passive – quite the opposite – but I’m convinced that if I am going to get anywhere that is worthwhile, I must learn to let go, be still, and listen.
Monday, July 21, 2008
revolution (but not the NY kind)
Black. Female. Accomplished. Attacked.
By Sophia A. NelsonSunday, July 20, 2008; B01
There she is — no, not Miss America, but the Angela-Davis-Afro-wearing, machine-gun-toting, angry, unpatriotic Michelle Obama, greeting her husband with a fist bump instead of a kiss on the cheek.
It was supposed to be satire, but the caricature of Barack Obama and his wife that appeared on the cover of the New Yorker last week rightly caused a major flap. And among black professional women like me and many of my sisters in the Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority, who happened to be gathered last week in Washington for our 100th anniversary celebration, the mischaracterization of Michelle hit the rawest of nerves.
Welcome to our world.
We’ve watched with a mixture of pride and trepidation as the wife of the first serious African American presidential contender has weathered recent campaign travails — being called unpatriotic for a single offhand remark, dubbed a black radical because of something she wrote more than 20 years ago and plastered with the crowning stereotype: “angry black woman.” And then being forced to undergo a politically mandated “makeover” to soften her image and make her more palatable to mainstream America.
Sad to say, but what Obama has undergone, though it’s on a national stage and on a much more prominent scale, is nothing new to professional African American women. We endure this type of labeling all the time. We’re endlessly familiar with the problem Michelle Obama is confronting — being looked at, as black women, through a different lens from our white counterparts, who are portrayed as kinder, gentler souls who somehow deserve to be loved and valued more than we do. So many of us are hoping that Michelle — as an elegant and elusive combination of successful career woman, supportive wife and loving mother — can change that.
“Ain’t I a woman?” Sojourner Truth famously asked 157 years ago. Her ringing question, demanding why black women weren’t accorded the same privileges as their white counterparts, still sums up the African American woman’s dilemma today: How are we viewed as women, and where do we fit into American life?
“Thanks to the hip-hop industry,” one prominent black female journalist recently said to me, all black women are “deemed ’sexually promiscuous video vixens’ not worthy of consideration. If other black women speak up, we’re considered angry black women who complain. This society can’t even see a woman like Michelle Obama. All it sees is a black woman and attaches stereotypes.”
Black women have been mischaracterized and stereotyped since the days of slavery and minstrel shows. In more recent times, they’ve been portrayed onscreen and in popular culture as either sexually available bed wenches in such shows as the 2000 docudrama “Sally Hemings: An American Scandal,” ignorant and foolish servants such as Prissy from “Gone With the Wind” or ever-smiling housekeepers, workhorses who never complain and never tire, like the popular figure of Aunt Jemima.
Even in the 21st century, black women are still bombarded with media and Internet images that portray us as loud, aggressive, violent and often grossly obese and unattractive. Think of the movies “Norbit” or “Big Momma’s House,” or of the only two black female characters in “Enchanted,” an overweight, aggressive traffic cop and an angry divorcĂ©e amid all the white princesses. On the other hand, when was the last time you saw a smart, accomplished black professional woman portrayed on mainstream television or in the movies? If Claire Huxtable on “The Cosby Show” comes to mind, remember that she left the scene 16 years ago.
The reality is that in just a generation, many black women — who were mostly domestics, schoolteachers or nurses in the post-slavery Jim Crow era — have become astronauts, corporate executives, doctors, lawyers, engineers and PhDs. You name it, and black women have achieved it. The most popular woman on daytime television is Oprah Winfrey. Condoleezza Rice is secretary of state.
And yet my generation of African American women — we’re called, in fact, the Claire Huxtable generation — hasn’t managed to become successfully integrated into American popular culture. We’re still looking for respect in the workplace, where, more than anything else, black women feel invisible. It’s a term that comes up again and again. “In my profession, white men mentor young whites on how to succeed,” a financial executive told me, but “they’re either indifferent to or dogmatically document the mistakes black women make. Their indifference is the worst, because it means we’re invisible.”
As someone who recently left a large law firm to work in the corporate sector, I have to agree. I liked my firm, but I always felt that I had to sink or swim on my own. I didn’t get the kind of mentoring that I saw white colleagues, male and female, getting all around me. The firm was actually one of the better ones when it came to diversity, and yet of 600 partners, only five were black women.
A 2007 American Bar Association report titled “Visible Invisibility” describes how black women in the legal profession face the “double burden” of being both black and female, meaning that they enjoy none of the advantages that black men gain from being male, or that white women gain from being white.
Invisibility isn’t the only problem. I run an organization dedicated to supporting African American professional women and often run empowerment workshops at various conferences. At a recent such workshop, I asked the participants to list some words that would describe how they believe they’re viewed in the workplace and the culture at large. These are the kinds of words that came back: “loud,” “angry,” “intimidating,” “mean,” “opinionated,” “aggressive,” “hard.” All painful words. Yet asked to describe themselves, the same women offered gentler terms: “strong,” “loving,” “dependable,” “compassionate.”
Where does the disconnect come from? Possibly from the way black women have been forced into roles of strength for decades. “Black women are the original multitaskers of necessity,” says one nonprofit executive. “We’ve perfected it because we’ve been doing it for so long. But people don’t appreciate the skill it requires, and they don’t recognize the toll it takes on us as human beings.”
For all our success in the professional world, we have paid a significant price in our private and emotional lives. A life of preordained singleness (by chance, not by choice) is fast becoming the plight of alarming numbers of professional black women in America. The fact is that the more money and education a black woman has, the less likely she is to marry and have a family.
Consider these stunning statistics: As of 2007, according to the New York Times, 70 percent of professional black women were unmarried. Black women are five times more likely than white women to be single at age 40. In 2003, Newsweek reported that there are more black women than black men (24 percent to 17 percent) in the professional-managerial class. According to Department of Education statistics cited by the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, black women earn 67 percent of all bachelor’s degrees awarded to blacks, as well as 71 percent of all master’s degrees and 65 percent of all doctoral degrees.
With all the challenges facing professional black women today, we hope that Michelle Obama will defy the negative stereotypes about us. And that, now that a strong professional black woman is center stage, she’ll bring to light what we already know: that an accomplished black woman can be a loyal and supportive wife and a good mother and still fulfill her own dreams. The fact that her husband clearly adores Michelle is both refreshing and reassuring to many of us who long to find a good man who will love and appreciate us.
Recently, a friend who’s a married professional mother of three girls wrote to me: “I think one of the most interesting things about Michelle Obama is that what she and her husband are doing is pretty revolutionary these days — and I don’t mean running for president. For a black man and woman in the U.S. to be happily married, with children, and working as partners to build a life — let alone a life of service to others — all while rearing their children together is downright revolutionary.”
It’s how so many black professional women feel. And our hope is that if Michelle Obama becomes first lady, the revolution will come to us at last.
snelson@iaskinc.org
Sophia A. Nelson is a corporate attorney and president of iask, Inc., an organization for African American professional women.
By Sophia A. NelsonSunday, July 20, 2008; B01
There she is — no, not Miss America, but the Angela-Davis-Afro-wearing, machine-gun-toting, angry, unpatriotic Michelle Obama, greeting her husband with a fist bump instead of a kiss on the cheek.
It was supposed to be satire, but the caricature of Barack Obama and his wife that appeared on the cover of the New Yorker last week rightly caused a major flap. And among black professional women like me and many of my sisters in the Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority, who happened to be gathered last week in Washington for our 100th anniversary celebration, the mischaracterization of Michelle hit the rawest of nerves.
Welcome to our world.
We’ve watched with a mixture of pride and trepidation as the wife of the first serious African American presidential contender has weathered recent campaign travails — being called unpatriotic for a single offhand remark, dubbed a black radical because of something she wrote more than 20 years ago and plastered with the crowning stereotype: “angry black woman.” And then being forced to undergo a politically mandated “makeover” to soften her image and make her more palatable to mainstream America.
Sad to say, but what Obama has undergone, though it’s on a national stage and on a much more prominent scale, is nothing new to professional African American women. We endure this type of labeling all the time. We’re endlessly familiar with the problem Michelle Obama is confronting — being looked at, as black women, through a different lens from our white counterparts, who are portrayed as kinder, gentler souls who somehow deserve to be loved and valued more than we do. So many of us are hoping that Michelle — as an elegant and elusive combination of successful career woman, supportive wife and loving mother — can change that.
“Ain’t I a woman?” Sojourner Truth famously asked 157 years ago. Her ringing question, demanding why black women weren’t accorded the same privileges as their white counterparts, still sums up the African American woman’s dilemma today: How are we viewed as women, and where do we fit into American life?
“Thanks to the hip-hop industry,” one prominent black female journalist recently said to me, all black women are “deemed ’sexually promiscuous video vixens’ not worthy of consideration. If other black women speak up, we’re considered angry black women who complain. This society can’t even see a woman like Michelle Obama. All it sees is a black woman and attaches stereotypes.”
Black women have been mischaracterized and stereotyped since the days of slavery and minstrel shows. In more recent times, they’ve been portrayed onscreen and in popular culture as either sexually available bed wenches in such shows as the 2000 docudrama “Sally Hemings: An American Scandal,” ignorant and foolish servants such as Prissy from “Gone With the Wind” or ever-smiling housekeepers, workhorses who never complain and never tire, like the popular figure of Aunt Jemima.
Even in the 21st century, black women are still bombarded with media and Internet images that portray us as loud, aggressive, violent and often grossly obese and unattractive. Think of the movies “Norbit” or “Big Momma’s House,” or of the only two black female characters in “Enchanted,” an overweight, aggressive traffic cop and an angry divorcĂ©e amid all the white princesses. On the other hand, when was the last time you saw a smart, accomplished black professional woman portrayed on mainstream television or in the movies? If Claire Huxtable on “The Cosby Show” comes to mind, remember that she left the scene 16 years ago.
The reality is that in just a generation, many black women — who were mostly domestics, schoolteachers or nurses in the post-slavery Jim Crow era — have become astronauts, corporate executives, doctors, lawyers, engineers and PhDs. You name it, and black women have achieved it. The most popular woman on daytime television is Oprah Winfrey. Condoleezza Rice is secretary of state.
And yet my generation of African American women — we’re called, in fact, the Claire Huxtable generation — hasn’t managed to become successfully integrated into American popular culture. We’re still looking for respect in the workplace, where, more than anything else, black women feel invisible. It’s a term that comes up again and again. “In my profession, white men mentor young whites on how to succeed,” a financial executive told me, but “they’re either indifferent to or dogmatically document the mistakes black women make. Their indifference is the worst, because it means we’re invisible.”
As someone who recently left a large law firm to work in the corporate sector, I have to agree. I liked my firm, but I always felt that I had to sink or swim on my own. I didn’t get the kind of mentoring that I saw white colleagues, male and female, getting all around me. The firm was actually one of the better ones when it came to diversity, and yet of 600 partners, only five were black women.
A 2007 American Bar Association report titled “Visible Invisibility” describes how black women in the legal profession face the “double burden” of being both black and female, meaning that they enjoy none of the advantages that black men gain from being male, or that white women gain from being white.
Invisibility isn’t the only problem. I run an organization dedicated to supporting African American professional women and often run empowerment workshops at various conferences. At a recent such workshop, I asked the participants to list some words that would describe how they believe they’re viewed in the workplace and the culture at large. These are the kinds of words that came back: “loud,” “angry,” “intimidating,” “mean,” “opinionated,” “aggressive,” “hard.” All painful words. Yet asked to describe themselves, the same women offered gentler terms: “strong,” “loving,” “dependable,” “compassionate.”
Where does the disconnect come from? Possibly from the way black women have been forced into roles of strength for decades. “Black women are the original multitaskers of necessity,” says one nonprofit executive. “We’ve perfected it because we’ve been doing it for so long. But people don’t appreciate the skill it requires, and they don’t recognize the toll it takes on us as human beings.”
For all our success in the professional world, we have paid a significant price in our private and emotional lives. A life of preordained singleness (by chance, not by choice) is fast becoming the plight of alarming numbers of professional black women in America. The fact is that the more money and education a black woman has, the less likely she is to marry and have a family.
Consider these stunning statistics: As of 2007, according to the New York Times, 70 percent of professional black women were unmarried. Black women are five times more likely than white women to be single at age 40. In 2003, Newsweek reported that there are more black women than black men (24 percent to 17 percent) in the professional-managerial class. According to Department of Education statistics cited by the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, black women earn 67 percent of all bachelor’s degrees awarded to blacks, as well as 71 percent of all master’s degrees and 65 percent of all doctoral degrees.
With all the challenges facing professional black women today, we hope that Michelle Obama will defy the negative stereotypes about us. And that, now that a strong professional black woman is center stage, she’ll bring to light what we already know: that an accomplished black woman can be a loyal and supportive wife and a good mother and still fulfill her own dreams. The fact that her husband clearly adores Michelle is both refreshing and reassuring to many of us who long to find a good man who will love and appreciate us.
Recently, a friend who’s a married professional mother of three girls wrote to me: “I think one of the most interesting things about Michelle Obama is that what she and her husband are doing is pretty revolutionary these days — and I don’t mean running for president. For a black man and woman in the U.S. to be happily married, with children, and working as partners to build a life — let alone a life of service to others — all while rearing their children together is downright revolutionary.”
It’s how so many black professional women feel. And our hope is that if Michelle Obama becomes first lady, the revolution will come to us at last.
snelson@iaskinc.org
Sophia A. Nelson is a corporate attorney and president of iask, Inc., an organization for African American professional women.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)